Do you want SMP MacPPC? Look over here, donations are needed!

Contributed by jj on 2007-01-31 from the Have-smp-will-donate dept.

Gordon W Klok (gwk@) is looking to start work on multiprocessor support for the MacPPC platform.
Gordon writes...

Update my request for a faster new world macintosh to a dual processor
machine.
martin@ reports macppc is very stable on his single processor Power
Macintosh 7600, where I can barely manage a cvs checkout on my 9500MP
or 9600MP so ask if someone can part with one of these.

Bret Lambert, who has previously helped coordinating donations of SUN Blade 1000 machines to kettenis@ and jason@, has agreed to coordinate this effort.

He's accepting donations on paypal bret.lambert@gmail.com.
If you have other questions about this donation effort, please email him on above email address.

As usual, if collected funds exceed what is necessary to get this machine, they will be donated to OpenBSD.

So for those of you who wants your dual CPU MacPPC machines to get SMP support, this is your chance, donate now!

(Comments are closed)

Comments

By Anonymous Coward (193.63.217.208) on 2007-02-01 10:12

Out of curiosity, how much of SMP is machine-independent and how much must be re-done for each arch?
Comments
1. By Bret Lambert (tbert) on 2007-02-01 12:21
  
  > Out of curiosity, how much of SMP is machine-independent and how much must be re-done for each arch?
  The answer to both is "a whole lot."
  
  SMP is not only spinning up secondary processors and figuring out
  how to keep interrupts from stepping all over each other, it's
  making sure that data accesses and function calls in the kernel
  are thread-safe (grep src/sys for the MULTIPROCESSOR #define
  sometime).
By Jeremy Aaron Horland (70.107.52.252) jhorland@jhorland.com on 2007-02-05 14:29

I have a DP daughtercard for a "quicksilver" mac...

if you are interested in it, it's yours.

Jeremy Aaron Horland
Comments
1. By Bret Lambert (tbert) on 2007-02-06 03:43
  
  > I have a DP daughtercard for a "quicksilver" mac...
  >
  >
  > if you are interested in it, it's yours.
  >
  >
  >
  > Jeremy Aaron Horland
  
  If gwk@ doesn't want it, I'd gladly take what you would have spent on shipping...
By Anonymous Coward (128.171.90.200) on 2007-02-05 19:40

How much is needed ?
Comments
1. By Bret Lambert (tbert) on 2007-02-06 03:41
  
  > How much is needed ?
  >
  >
  
  I'm hoping to get $800 or so, in order to get a reasonably fast machine (faster machine -> more development -> that much closer to world domination), and I've gotten about $200 thus far.
  Comments
  1. By Anonymous Coward (128.171.90.200) on 2007-02-06 18:46
    
    I've just dropped you another $100
    
    Comments
    
    By Bret Lambert (tbert) on 2007-02-06 20:08
    
    > I've just dropped you another $100
    
    Got it, thanks!

Latest Articles

Fri, Apr 26
- 08:33 Passphrase timeout for disk decryption at boot added (potential battery lifesaver) (2)
Wed, Apr 24
- 04:35 Game of Trees 0.98 released (2)
Tue, Apr 23
- 05:25 pfctl(8) and systat(8) to display fragment reassembly statistics (0)
Thu, Apr 18
- 05:05 Coming soon to a -current system near you: parallel raw IP input (0)
Wed, Apr 17
- 05:33 In -current, default write format for tar(1) changed to "pax" (12)
Wed, Apr 10
- 18:50 OpenSMTPD 7.5.0p0 Released (2)
Tue, Apr 09
- 04:49 20 years since "and we're just starting": undeadly.org turns 20 (2024-04-09) (13)
Fri, Apr 05
- 06:16 OpenBSD 7.5 released (3)
Thu, Mar 28
- 18:18 LibreSSL 3.8.4 and 3.9.1 released (0)

Credits

Copyright © 2004-2008 Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to April 2nd 2004 as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]