Contributed by jolan on from the secure-by-default dept.
(Comments are closed)
OpenBSD Journal
Contributed by jolan on from the secure-by-default dept.
(Comments are closed)
Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]
By Anonymous Coward (84.188.250.101) on
But is there absolutly NO grafic-card wich is not that "evil"?
A solution would be to make the Kernel handle the drivers. Or am I wrong? (No request, just a question)
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (67.64.89.177) on
By Anonymous Coward (134.58.253.131) on
And of course vendor-supplied binary blobs are totally unacceptable. Binary drivers in kernel-space don't even need to have bugs that allow clever tricks to abuse a video card to read main memory, as they can just read it...
Comments
By djm@ (203.217.30.86) on
By Anonymous Coward (83.253.24.77) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (66.65.22.47) on
By pdemb (83.23.245.118) pdembinski@o2.pl on www.peter.dembinski.prv.pl
Does it mean that sparc (not 64) arch is safe to use for X terminal?
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (128.171.90.200) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (128.171.90.200) on
see
xf86(4)
and
the FAQ
If it doesn't use the driver then it means it has less `evil`.
By Anonymous Coward (62.252.32.11) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (83.253.24.77) on
Comments
By tedu (69.12.168.114) on
By Anonymous Coward (128.171.90.200) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (128.171.90.200) on