Contributed by jolan on from the if-its-trivial-why-does-it-need-a-proxy dept.
(Comments are closed)
OpenBSD Journal
Contributed by jolan on from the if-its-trivial-why-does-it-need-a-proxy dept.
(Comments are closed)
Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]
By Anonymous Coward (69.70.207.240) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (68.106.232.57) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (193.63.217.208) on
By Anonymous Coward (212.123.1.149) on
By Jason houx (216.201.34.104) on
I'm a keeping my fingers crossed. ;-)
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (24.46.21.229) on
By Anonymous Coward (193.167.7.12) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (216.135.89.5) on
By Jason Houx (216.201.34.104) on
But to get to your question - if you have a nat gateway that doesn't support a tftp fixup (Cisco, Linux) you will have a lot of problems with tftp. This will fix that problem.
By scarynetworkguy (12.18.141.172) on
By David (87.1.218.182) david@bsdgeek.it on
Is this DLS (jcs' employer) "Hosted PBX" a solution based on Asterisk and OpenBSD?
Comments
By Brad (216.138.195.228) brad at comstyle dot com on
Comments
By David (82.53.151.176) david@bsdgeek.it on
As stated here, pf+tftp-proxy is used to protect their pbx system, so I was asking if the pbx too is OpenBSB based. It's just curiosity!
By Kevin Kadow (24.148.72.216) openbsd@msg.net on
The "Practical Paranoid" values an application proxy for even the most primitive protocols, and if any protocols qualifies as primitive, TFTP would be that protocol.