Contributed by grey on from the cisco, ietf, cert, politics and triumph dept.
The complete article may be found here: http://kerneltrap.org/node/5382
(Comments are closed)
OpenBSD Journal
Contributed by grey on from the cisco, ietf, cert, politics and triumph dept.
The complete article may be found here: http://kerneltrap.org/node/5382
(Comments are closed)
Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]
By Han (82.73.147.65) han@mijncomputer.nl on
By Anonymous Coward (68.202.43.80) on
If these companies really cared about their customers, they would be more concerned about quickly fixing such critical infrastructure problems rather than trying to patent the solution and extract money from everyone who is simply trying to protect themselves. This kind of problem affects us all.
Comments
By Han (82.73.147.65) han@mijncomputer.nl on
I mean, that would be unheard of in any other industry.
By Anonymous Coward (202.79.221.151) on
By Oliver E. (62.65.148.234) on
discussed numerous times in the past (and e.g let most vendors
not implement source quench). It's not exactly rocket science to
figure out vulnerabilities of connectivity resulting from ICMP
either.
While I fail to understand why this should be "news" of any kind,
an Internet Draft to fix the protocol definitions is most welcome.
Comments
By teemu (193.110.28.9) on http://teemu.lynix.net
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (62.65.148.234) on
By Anonymous Coward (143.166.255.17) on
By Jason Crawford (65.174.217.58) jasonrcrawford@gmail.com on
By Peter (62.141.24.1) on
Check http://secunia.com/advisories/15978/ it means system compromise from remote? Am I right?
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (193.63.217.208) on
Maybe someone who understands better could comment on if privsep or even pro-police would affect this?