Contributed by grey on from the biking and bug squashing dept.
You can read the complete story here.
(Comments are closed)
OpenBSD Journal
Contributed by grey on from the biking and bug squashing dept.
You can read the complete story here.
(Comments are closed)
Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]
By Anonymous Coward (24.34.57.27) on
Subject: Re: Anatomy of a bug
From: br1an <brian () ethernet ! org>
Date: 2004-09-10 11:28:02
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0409100725580.4267 () fatboy ! ethernet ! org>
[Download message RAW]
so basically what you're saying is that we have some fuck who can't
code for shit - proven across two daemons you wrote - commiting code
both to the userland and kernel of an OS we all rely on for various
missions?
great... thanks for keeping us posted.
-b.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (213.119.133.115) on
Keep up the good work Henning.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (82.182.103.172) on
The code went under tremendous efforts to be efficient and secure. If you get crashes, panics, hangs, or anything else that you think you shouldn't, after making sure it's only reproducable on GENERIC kernels patched with Stephanie, mail me. Don't mail OpenBSD related mailing lists -- they have enough bugs to deal with as it is. ;)
Why does the word "jerk" pop into my mind?
/SH
By djm@ (203.217.30.86) on
Comments
By Miod Vallat (212.234.41.17) miod@ on
By Anonymous Coward (69.197.92.181) on
By Anonymous Coward (195.217.242.33) on
Comments
By Miod Vallat (212.234.41.17) miod@ on
Comments
By Otto Moerbeek (82.197.192.49) otto@drijf.net on http://www.drijf.net
Nice to know: the whole of TeX was written out on paper in Pascal before he even typed a single line on a terminal.
By Anonymous Coward (69.197.92.181) on
By Anonymous Coward (80.58.34.107) on
Comments
By Mark Patterson (210.49.99.38) on
But this does show that maybe the exclusive use of pure non-OO C is part of the problem. This is the sort of thing that OO design encourages you to encapsulate from the outset, the typical Add and Remove methods that I have used a number of times.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (195.217.242.33) on
By Anonymous Coward (143.166.226.16) on
Comments
By SH (82.182.103.172) on
That OO is used in situations where it's ill suited are well known, except for those that should know. But to claim that OO is good for almost nothing is pure ignorant drivel.
/SH
By Johan M:son Lindman (62.119.71.148) on
looks like a dedicated effort by Henning, Claudio et al.
Comments
By Craig (194.72.54.134) on
By Anonymous Coward (217.215.66.75) on
root, god, what's the difference..
By chas (147.154.235.53) on
I don't like to mess with this CVS stuff.
Comments
By Otto Moerbeek (213.84.84.111) otto@drijf.net on http://www.drijf.net
Comments
By henning (199.185.136.137) henning@openbsd on