Contributed by jose on from the beat-it-til-it-dies dept.
Is anyone working on more extended tests for OpenBSD than those that already exist?
(Comments are closed)
OpenBSD Journal
Contributed by jose on from the beat-it-til-it-dies dept.
Is anyone working on more extended tests for OpenBSD than those that already exist?
(Comments are closed)
Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]
By Blackmage () julien.touche@lycos.com on mailto:julien.touche@lycos.com
By Blackmage () julien.touche@lycos.com on mailto:julien.touche@lycos.com
SSBA
unixbench (byte)
contest (linux kernel)
By Todd Fries () todd@openbsd.org on http://todd.fries.net/resume.html
By Anonymous Coward () on
It doesn't help if you ignore bug reports, and don't fix any of the problems, so maybe that's why they need testing tools.
Comments
By djm () on
By Anonymous Coward () on
By Anonymous Coward () on
After all, we'll never get to the Star Trek "level 5 diagnostic" or what ever it was, until we do more testing along the way. But of course, around here it seems that no one sends in their dmesg's, so who would report that regression tests failed?
By Chad Loder () on