Contributed by Dengue on from the now-stop-askin dept.
(Comments are closed)
OpenBSD Journal
Contributed by Dengue on from the now-stop-askin dept.
(Comments are closed)
Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]
By Anonymous Coward () on
Again? Has no-one ever bothered to look for this - it's on the internet in a million places *and* in `The Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operatiing System'. This damn article gets dragged up every bloody 6 months because some damn fools cant be bothered to find out themselves. Quote freebsd-questions list at least twice a day:
I never see `Linux family trees' due to them being such convoluted mish mashes of pantsness.
Sorry - rant over ;) BTW, It's a good article.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
Now we have a FM to reference when they ask that question :)
Comments
By Person who originally posted the comment... () on
By James Howard () howardjp@well.com on mailto:howardjp@well.com
Comments
By BluNereid () on
--BluNereid
By Person who originally submitted the comment... () on
Any time ;)
Apologies if it looked like I was having a go at your article, but I was having a go at the fools out there in `the wild'. As someone previously posted, we now have somewhere that we can point (i.e TFM!!!). Good work.
Cheers!
By c2n () on
And as for Linux Family Trees, well one day, after "Linux-Darwinism", it'll be an interesting read also.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
Linux-Darwinism
Oh someone shoot me. Linux will get murdered by Darwin/Os X because it actually works. Lets just hope Gnome doesnt suddenly jump to *BSD when that happens or we're buggered. KDE yes, gnome no!
Comments
By Miod Vallat () miod@openbsd.org on mailto:miod@openbsd.org
On the other hand, KDE is getting more and more Linux-centric, although they still present this project as a ``desktop environment for unix workstations'', because most of it happens to compile, and sometimes run, on other systems.
So I wouldn't be suprised if gnome gets more accepted and used in the BSD community in the future.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
How about a poll on this:
For an OpenBSD desktop I:-
use X default
-
like KDE
-
would like to see Gnome ported
-
would pay for CDE
-
would pay for CDE (if the vendors offered a stack to OpenBSD)
-
would pay for a port of windows3.x ;)
- /dev/null (X/Windows sucks... who cares?)
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By proof () mattb at 54 org on http://ifconfig.net
By sarnold () sarnold who attends willamette university on mailto:sarnold who attends willamette university
I imagine Peter Salus has some works that may prove interesting, though I can't promise this.
By Toojays () toojays@subdimension.com on mailto:toojays@subdimension.com
Comments
By Alex de Haas () alex@purebsd.com on http://purebsd.com
I believe it was about BSD using proprietary
code fragments from AT&T Unix.
-- Alex
By c2n () on
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/opensources/book/kirkmck.html
By Anonymous Coward () on
straight. Just how many FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD,
and Darwin/OS/X computers are out there?
Comments
By proof () mattb at 54 org on http://ifconfig.net
--Matt
Comments
By proof () proof at 54 org on http://ifconfig.net